Living Donor Liver Transplantation as a Backup Procedure: Treatment Strategy for Hepatocellular Adenomas Requiring Complex Resections.

METHODS: We present a series of three patients with large hepatocellular adenoma lesions showing a central location, for which the living donor liver transplantation strategy was used as a backup procedure. RESULTS: Hepatocellular adenoma was confirmed by biopsy in all patients. Surgical resection was indicated because of the patients' symptoms and lesion size and growth. All patients had a lesion that was central or in close contact with major vessels. The final decision to proceed with the resection was made intraoperatively. A live donor was prepared for all three patients. Two patients underwent portal vein embolization associated with extended hepatectomy, and a total hepatectomy plus liver transplantation with a living donor was performed in one patient. All patients had good postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of hepatocellular adenomas for which complex resections are necessary and resectability can only be confirmed intraoperatively, surgical safety can be improved through the use of a living donor backup. Center expertise with living donor liver transplantation is paramount for the success of this approach.

Current Practice in Immunosuppression in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

The last decades have witnessed a significant improvement in the field of pediatric liver transplantation (LT), resulting in longer patient and graft survival; adequate graft selection, surgical refinement, the use of live donors and optimal postoperative care are among the reasons why pediatric recipients are living longer. With this new condition, pediatric recipients are now more exposed to the deleterious effects of immunosuppression, including metabolic, infectious and neoplastic complications, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Due to all those particularities, the approach to avoid overimmunosuppression or underimmunosuppression may be more difficult in children than in adult recipients. Moreover, pediatric recipients are exposed to growth issues and specific problems during adolescence, like nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy. This article highlights the current immunosuppressive strategies for pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Domino Liver Transplant in Maple Syrup Urine Disease: Technical Details of Cases in Which the First Surgery Involved a Living Donor.

BACKGROUND: Data describing the technical aspects of living donor (LD) domino liver transplantation (DLT) in maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) are limited. The largest published series includes only 3 cases. One great challenge of this procedure is to ensure adequate vascular stumps for the LD, the MSUD patient, and the recipient of the domino graft. Here, we describe our experience in 11 cases of LD-DLT in MSUD, highlighting the technical aspects of LD-DLT. METHODS: From September 2012 to September 2017, 11 patients with MSUD underwent LD liver transplantation at our institution, and MSUD livers were used as domino grafts in 11 children. RESULTS: (1) MSUD patients: 10 patients received a left lateral segment. The donor's left hepatic vein (HV) was anastomosed to the confluence of the recipient's 3 HVs. No vascular grafts (VG) were required for portal vein (PV) anastomosis. Single arterial anastomosis was performed with microsurgery in 10 of 11 patients. (2) MSUD graft recipients: In 8 cases, HV reconstruction was performed between the graft's HV confluence and the recipient's HV confluence, and in 3 cases, a vena cava triangulation was necessary; 6 MSUD grafts required HV venoplasty. No VG were needed for HV reconstruction. VG were used for PV reconstruction in 3 cases due to sclerotic PV. In 2 cases, double arterial anastomoses were performed in the MSUD liver. All patients remain alive and well. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplantation followed by DLT for MSUD is a complex procedure and demands technical refinement. Special attention must be paid to vascular reconstruction.

Pancreas-preserving duodenectomy after living donor liver transplantation for invasive cytomegalovirus disease.

CMV infection plays an important role in the postoperative course following solid organ transplantation. We present the case of an 11-year-old male patient who underwent LDLT due to severe hepatopulmonary syndrome and biliary cirrhosis. Four weeks after LDLT, he developed persistent GI bleeding and was subjected to repeated endoscopic treatment and radiological arterial embolization to stop the bleeding from duodenal ulcers. Diagnostic workup was negative for CMV disease. Because the bleeding persisted, surgical treatment was indicated, and a pancreas-preserving duodenectomy was performed. Immunohistochemical staining of the surgical specimen demonstrated diffuse endothelial infiltration by CMV. Despite ganciclovir treatment, the patient developed new erosions in the jejunal mucosa and melena; ganciclovir was discontinued, and foscarnet was started, resulting in clinical improvement and the cessation of bleeding. This case highlights the technical aspects of performing a complex upper GI resection in a patient recently subjected to LDLT, taking care to avoid injury to the previous liver graft anastomosis and restore GI continuity. Moreover, CMV tissue-invasive disease compartmentalized in the GI tract may be difficult to diagnose, as indicated by the negative results of antigenemia and PCR assays and endoscopic superficial mucosal biopsies.

Living donor liver transplantation for neonatal fulminant hepatitis due to herpes simplex virus infection.

Although rare, ALF caused by disseminated HSV infection is associated with high mortality in the neonatal population. This condition is often diagnosed relatively late due to the absence of specific signs. We present a case involving a neonate with ALF submitted to living donor liver transplantation without a prior diagnosis. The patient had no skin or mucosal lesions, and IgM serology was negative for HSV-1 and HSV-2. Immunohistochemical staining of the liver explant was positive for herpes virus infection, and the patient subsequently received antiviral drug treatment, with a good outcome. Due to organ shortages and the rarity of the aforementioned condition, LT has seldom been reported for the treatment of ALF caused by herpes virus infection; however, LT may be the only option for neonates with fulminant hepatitis. The use of living donors in an urgent scenario is well established in Eastern countries and safely applicable for pediatric patients with ALF.

Simultaneous or sequential gastrectomy in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

The association between LT and gastrectomy is not common. Only two studies reported the gastrectomy/LT association in children. Here, we report three children who underwent LT who required a concomitant or sequential gastrectomy for different reasons. Patient 1, a 16-yr-old boy, during the LT, underwent a partial gastrectomy due to extensive injury to the duodenum. He had a previous and unusual portoenterostomy performed in the duodenum. Bowel reconstruction was performed using an intestinal loop that was first used for the bilio-enteric anastomosis and then connected to the gastric stump. Patient 2, a 22-month-old female child, underwent a partial gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction during a retransplantation. She had a large perforated gastric ulcer blocked by the allograft liver. Patient 3, a 26-month-old male child, five yr after living donor LT, was submitted to a partial gastrectomy because of gastric outlet obstruction. The histopathology was compatible with eosinophilic gastritis. The association between LT and gastrectomy in the pediatric population is extremely rare. Appropriate knowledge of the previous transplantation technique is very important. Further studies are required to assess the outcomes of the different types of gastric reconstruction in pediatric recipients.